Let me repeat that: A Girls high school basketball team beat an opponent 100-0 last week.
As a result of this situation and the outrage it caused amongst the opposing team’s players and fans (as well as home crowd parents and fans), the coach of the winning team was asked to apologize.
He refused. And then he was fired.
And I’ve got to say, I disagree with the school’s decision to fire him. I had this discussion with my roommates the other night and I’ve had the discussion with other people since then, and I honestly do not think the man deserved to be fired. In fact, I don’t think he even deserved to have an apology demanded of him by his own school. I hate to break it to the world, but what happened at that game is a little something I like to call REAL LIFE.
Before continuing, I’d like to at least present two different news stories covering the issue. I don’t expect you to read them, but understand that I’m not just making an ignorant post here. I’ve done some research into the issue and have a relative grasp of the situation.
LINK ONE: (I feel like this story is one of the most comprehensive analyses I've read so far).
LINK TWO: (This is an interview with a different coach who has been criticized in the past for dominating games and he shares his thoughts on what the 100-0 coach could have done differently).
Moving along. I understand the arguments. The winning girls didn’t need to be pressing, they didn’t need to be “shooting threes” when they were up 80-0. They should have toned it down and gone easy on the girls who were losing. They shouldn’t have played their hardest. They shouldn’t have given everything they could to be the best team they could, and they shouldn’t have played as hard as they could to improve their game and become the best players they could be. They should have performed worse because the opponent wasn’t at their level. In a game that both coaches agreed to play, the girls on the court who were winning should have been asked not to play to the best of their ability…because they were winning.
See where I’m going with this?
Tell me: if you own a business in America today, and you managed to be the most powerful giant in your particular industry, would you ever…EVER...give less than your best effort to create a better product, improve your current designs, and make your company a better company for your future and your employees’ futures?
No. If you did, do you know what you’d be? A company that never lived up to its potential. You’d be a company that had the potential to do great things and instead played down to a lower level because the competition was unable to keep up. Now, in regard to that statement, I understand that Microsoft and other monopolies (potential or legitimate) in history would be a great example of having to tone down their work in order to be “fair.” But that’s over an extended period of time, not one instance (such as this game).
If two companies were competing to make the best, most powerful, most innovative, most ____________ (fill in the blank) product, wouldn’t you want those two companies to give everything they could to make that one specific product? And if one of those company’s products just happened to completely blow the other company’s product out of the water, wouldn’t you be more likely to choose the product that dominated? Imagine this scenario with medicine. If two companies competed to make an effective cure for cancer in pill form, and one of the companies created a pill that obliterated cancer entirely while the second company only had a minimal impact on cancer, which one would you choose for yourself or a loved one with cancer?
And how would you feel if the company that could have made a perfect cancer cure didn’t give its best and ended up only making a pill that works at 80% or 90% efficiency? Would you feel like you’d been cheated? Would you feel like they should have done more to make it perfect?
Let’s look at it from another angle. People may think this is a drastic step, but for the sake of expressing my point, I’m going to throw it out here.
If you were in a war, human against human, in full-fledged, life or death competition, would you ever expect your general to tell you to lighten up just because you were winning? If you were a better trained army that performed its duties flawlessly, would you ever expect your general to say “Hey ladies and gentlemen…we’re really winning this thing, so let’s tone it down a little bit. Sure some of us may suffer as a result, some of us might be killed for not trying as hard as we could, but this is such a dominant fight in our favor that we should let up and allow them to take a few of our fellow soldiers down because right now this is just unfair.”
I would hope not.
Yes, I understand this was not a “war.” It was neither a real-life war nor a fictional pharmaceutical battle between two organizations looking to make a good product. But you know what? Those are real-life situations that could happen in the “real world.” And, considering sports are often considered to help build “real-life” skills like teamwork and leadership, why wouldn’t we admit that what happened in that game is a reflection of things that actually could happen in real-life?
Best Buy’s leadership would never say to Circuit City’s management, “We’re sorry you’re going out of business…we’ll go ahead and let up on our sales and our efforts a little bit to make sure you guys can make a few extra bucks before you go.”
The reason they would never say that is because THAT’S NOT WHAT HAPPENS IN REAL LIFE.
Now, at this point, most of you probably think I’m just a heartless jerk who doesn’t care about these poor girls and the fact that they lost 100-0, and if that’s what you think, I'm sorry, but I can deal with that. The truth of the matter is I’m not even saying that (if I were the coach) I would have done the same thing. I doubt I would have done the same thing. Not being in the situation, I’ll never know for sure. And, from what I've read, the winning team did some things it probably shouldn't have done. Not being there, this is simply my analysis of what I've read and what I've been able to determine from news reports. Bottom line, I don't know everything about the situation, and this is strictly my opinion.
But, what I do know is this. A basketball coach was fired for doing his job (winning a game) and then not apologizing for his win. I also know that the girls on his team who played their hearts out accomplished an amazing feat and, instead of being proud of their victory, they were made to feel ashamed of what they did. In fact, the leadership at their school tried to ask that their WIN be counted as a forfeit.
While I typically include lots of goofy links that are meant to be humorous, I feel pretty strongly on this subject. One of the reasons may be that my dad is a basketball coach himself and I can understand the pressure of always being expected to win and be successful as a coach. Maybe it’s because I’m tired of the world expecting everything to be fair for everyone at all times when the reality of life is that it’s rarely as fair and is never quite as ideal as our 3rd grade soccer leagues would like us to believe. Maybe it’s because I don’t believe a man or woman should feel guilty and be forced to apologize for doing his or her job to the best of his or her ability.
Regardless, I promise…PROMISE…I will be ready and willing to engage in a fair, intelligent conversation in the comments section of this post. I will not discount any commentary from anyone, whether I agree or disagree with anyone's opinion. I feel like this is one of those topics that should be discussed more in person than on paper or online, but I wanted to at least share my thoughts on the matter while it was fresh.
Finally, I’ll leave with two quotes from one of the articles linked to earlier in this post. The first is a quote from the winning school’s website posted by two members of the school’s Board of Trustees regarding their school’s “victory”:
“On Thursday, Covenant posted a statement on its Web site that said it "regrets... the outcome of the game with the Dallas Academy Varsity Girls Basketball team. It is shameful and an embarrassment that this happened. This clearly does not reflect a Christ-like [they are a Christian school] and honorable approach to competition." It was signed by Queal and Todd Doshier, chairman of the school's board of trustees.”The second quote is in the same news story and comes from the coach who was fired because he didn’t apologize for his victory.
"I respectfully disagree with the apology, especially the notion that the Covenant School girls basketball team should feel 'embarrassed' or 'ashamed,' " part of the post says. "We played the game as it was meant to be played and would not intentionally run up the score on any opponent. Although a wide-margin victory is never evidence of compassion, my girls played with honor and integrity and showed respect to Dallas Academy."
Grimes also included the quarter-by-quarter scoring on his post: 35, 24, 29, 12.
At the end of his post on the Web site, which identifies him as co-founder of Flight Basketball, Grimes wrote, "So if I lose my job over these statements, I will walk away with my integrity."
Again, I welcome any and all comments and discussions on this story and I promise to be open-minded and willing to hear all sides of the discussion.